4.6 Article

Optimization of Hot Water Treatment for Removing Microbial Colonies on Fresh Blueberry Surface

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE
Volume 76, Issue 6, Pages M353-M360

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02209.x

Keywords

blueberry; hot water treatment; microbial load; response surface methodology; wax/bloom

Funding

  1. Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station [MIS-501140]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Blueberries for the frozen market are washed but this process sometimes is not effective or further contaminates the berries. This study was designed to optimize conditions for hot water treatment (temperature, time, and antimicrobial concentration) to remove biofilm and decrease microbial load on blueberries. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image showed a well-developed microbial biofilm on blueberries dipped in room temperature water. The biofilm consisted of yeast and bacterial cells attached to the berry surface in the form of microcolonies, which produced exopolymer substances between or upon the cells. Berry exposure to 75 and 90 degrees C showed little to no microorganisms on the blueberry surface; however, the sensory quality (wax/bloom) of berries at those temperatures was unacceptable. Response surface plots showed that increasing temperature was a significant factor on reduction of aerobic plate counts (APCs) and yeast/mold counts (YMCs) while adding Boxyl (R) did not have significant effect on APC. Overlaid contour plots showed that treatments of 65 to 70 degrees C for 10 to 15 s showed maximum reductions of 1.5 and 2.0 log CFU/g on APCs and YMCs, respectively; with acceptable level of bloom/wax score on fresh blueberries. This study showed that SEM, response surface, and overlaid contour plots proved successful in arriving at optima to reduce microbial counts while maintaining bloom/wax on the surface of the blueberries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available