4.4 Review

Non-O157 Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli in Foods

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION
Volume 73, Issue 9, Pages 1721-1736

Publisher

INT ASSOC FOOD PROTECTION
DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X-73.9.1721

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Non-O157 Shiga toxin producing Escherichia colt (STEC) strains have been linked to outbreaks and sporadic cases of illness worldwide Illnesses linked to STEC serotypes other than 0157:H7 appear to be on the rise in the United States and worldwide. indicating that some of these organisms may be emerging pathogens As more laboratories are testing for these organisms in clinical samples, mote cases are uncovered. Some cases of non-O157 STEC illness appear to be as severe as cases associated with O157. although in general cases attributed to non-O157 are less severe There is much variation in virulence potential within STEC serotypes, and many may not be pathogenic Of more than 400 serotypes isolated, fewer than 10 serotypes cause the majority of STEC-related human illnesses Various virulence factors are Involved in non-O157 STEC pathogenicity, the combined presence of both eae and sta genes has been associated with enhanced virulence A scientific definition of a pathogenic STEC has not yet been accepted Several laboratories have attempted to develop detection and identification methods. and although substantial progress has been made, a practical method of STEC detection has yet to be validated Worldwide, foods associated with non-O157 STEC illness include sausage, ice cream. milk. and lettuce, among others Results from several studies suggest that control measures for 0157 may be effective for non-O157 STEC More research is needed to uncover unique characteristics and resistances of non-O157 STEC strains if they exist The public health significance of non-O157 STEC and the implications for industry practices and regulator actions are discussed

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available