4.7 Article

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modelling of local mean age of air distribution in forced-ventilation food plants

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages 90-103

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.06.014

Keywords

age of air; CFD code fluent; air velocity; ventilation efficiency; ventilated food plants

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reports the implementation of the mean age of air (MAA) concept into the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code Fluent through user-defined functions to assess ventilation efficiency inside forced-ventilation food plants. Two transient methods and a steady-state method based on the resolution of an additional scalar transport equation were implemented and compared with experimental and numerical data obtained by Bartak et al. [Bartak, M., Cermak, M., Clarke, J.A.. Denev, J., Drkal, F., Lain, M., Macdonald, I.A., Majer, M., Stankov, P., 2001. Experimental and numerical study of local mean age of air. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Building Performance Simulation Association (IBPSA) Conference, Rio de janeiro, Brazil; Bartak, M., Beausoleil-Morrison, I., Clarke,J.A.. Denev, J. Drkal, F., Lain, M., Macdonald, I.A., Melikov, A., Popiolek, Z., Stankov, P., 2002. Integrating CFD and building simulation. Building and Environment, 37. 865-871] for a 45 m(3) test room. As the steady-state method led to the best compromise between accuracy of results and computation time. this method was then used to characterize ventilation efficiency inside a pilot cheese ripening room and two modern sausage dryers of large height. In light of the results presented, local MAA is a better and a more sensitive parameter than mean air velocity for highlighting areas with inadequate ventilation, and thus for assessing ventilation efficiency in industrial food plants. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available