4.4 Article

Fluorometric Titration Assay of Affinity of Tight-Binding Nonfluorescent Inhibitor of Glutathione S-transferase

Journal

JOURNAL OF FLUORESCENCE
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 1-8

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10895-014-1475-z

Keywords

Glutathione S-transferase; Dissociation constant; Tight-binding inhibitor; Apparent inhibition constant; Fluorometric titration assay

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81071427]
  2. Natural Science Foundation Project of CQ [CSTC2012JJA0057]
  3. Education Ministry of China [20125503110007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To determine inhibition constant (K (i)) of tight-binding inhibitor, the putative method estimated an apparent K (i) from the response of initial rates to total concentrations of the inhibitor considering its depletion during binding for conversion into the true K (i), but was impractical with glutathione S-transferase of sophisticated kinetics. A fluorometric titration assay of dissociation constant (K (d)) was thus proposed. Schistosoma japonicum glutathione S-transferase (SjGST) action on a nonfluorescent divalent pro-inhibitor and glutathione yielded a divalent product in active site to act as a tight-binding inhibitor, whose binding quenched fluorescence of SjGST at 340 nm under the excitation at 280 nm. K (d) was estimated from the response of fluorescence of SjGST at 340 nm to total concentrations of the divalent product considering its depletion during binding. By fluorometric titration assay, K (d) of two tested nonfluorescent divalent products varied from subnanomolar to nanomolar, but both were resistant to change of SjGST levels and consistent with their apparent K (i) estimated via the putative method. Hence, fluorometric titration assay of K (d) of nonfluorescent tight-binding inhibitors/ligands was effective to GST and may be universally applicable to common enzymes/proteins; affinities of tight-binding inhibitors of GST can be approximated by their apparent K (i) estimated via the putative method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available