4.7 Article

Flow around six in-line square cylinders

Journal

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
Volume 710, Issue -, Pages 195-233

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2012.359

Keywords

flow-structure interactions; interacting wakes; low-Reynolds-number flows

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The flow around six in-line square cylinders has been studied numerically and experimentally for 0.5 <= s/d <= 10.0 and 80 <= Re <= 320, where s is the surface-to-surface distance between two cylinders, d is the size of the cylinder and R e is the Reynolds number. The effect of spacing on the flow regimes is initially studied numerically at Re = 100 for which a synchronous flow regime is observed for 0.5 <= s/d <= 1.1, while quasi-periodic-I, quasi-periodic-II and chaotic regimes occur between 1.2 <= s/d <= 1.3, 1.4 <= s/d <= 5.0 and 6.0 <= s/d <= 10.0, respectively. These regimes have been confirmed via particle-image-velocimetry-based experiments. A flow regime map is proposed as a function of spacing and Reynolds number. The flow is predominantly quasi-periodic-II or chaotic at higher Reynolds numbers. The quasi-periodic and chaotic nature of the flow is due to the wake interference effect of the upstream cylinders which becomes more severe at higher Reynolds numbers. The appearance of flow regimes is opposite to that for a row of cylinders. The Strouhal number for vortex shedding is the same for all the cylinders, especially for synchronous and quasi-periodic-I flow regimes. The mean drag (C-Dmean) experienced by the cylinders is less than that for an isolated cylinder, irrespective of the spacing. The first cylinder is relatively insensitive to the presence of downstream cylinders and the C-Dmean is almost constant at 1.2. The C-Dmean for the second and third cylinders may be negative, with the value of C-Dmean increasing monotonically with spacing. The changes in root mean square lift coefficient are consistent with changes in C-Dmean. Interestingly, the instantaneous lift force can be larger than the instantaneous drag force on the cylinders. These results should help improve understanding of flow around multiple bluff bodies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available