Journal
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages 392-404Publisher
AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/a0021800
Keywords
post-stop-signal slowing; proactive control; cognitive control; inhibition; stop-signal paradigm
Categories
Funding
- Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-07-1-0192]
- National Institute of Mental Health [R01-MH073878-01]
- National Science Foundation [BCS 0957074]
- Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci
- Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [0957074] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Cognitive control enables flexible interaction with a dynamic environment. In 2 experiments, the authors investigated control adjustments in the stop-signal paradigm, a procedure that requires balancing speed (going) and caution (stopping) in a dual-task environment. Focusing on the slowing of go reaction times after stop signals, the authors tested 5 competing hypotheses for post-stop-signal adjustments: goal priority, error detection, conflict monitoring, surprise, and memory. Reaction times increased after both successful and failed inhibition, consistent with the goal priority hypothesis and inconsistent with the error detection and conflict hypotheses. Post-stop-signal slowing was greater if the go task stimulus repeated on consecutive trials, suggesting a contribution of memory. We also found evidence for slowing based on more than the immediately preceding stop signal. Post-stop-signal slowing was greater when stop signals occurred more frequently (Experiment 1), inconsistent with the surprise hypothesis, and when inhibition failed more frequently (Experiment 2). This suggests that more global manipulations encompassing many trials affect post-stop-signal adjustments.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available