4.4 Article

Effects of water current on swimming performance, ventilation frequency, and feeding behavior of young seahorses (Hippocampus erectus)

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MARINE BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY
Volume 461, Issue -, Pages 337-343

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2014.09.001

Keywords

Feeding; Hippocampus erectus; Swimming performance; Ventilation; Water current

Funding

  1. Outstanding Youth Foundation in Guangdong Province [S2013050014802]
  2. National Science Fund for Excellent Young Scholars [41322038]
  3. Guangdong Oceanic and Fisheries Science and Technology Foundation [A201201I03, A201208G02]
  4. Development of Special Biology Industry in Shenzhen City [HY20130205001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Seahorses are poor swimmers, and their dispersion is a topic of increasing interest for their conservation. In the present study, the swimming performance, ventilation, and feeding behavior of the young seahorses Hippocampus erectus Perry, 1810 under simulated water currents (control-, low-, mid-, and high velocities) were investigated. Between 25.0% and 33.9% of the seahorses in the experimental groups (3, 10, and 30 days post birth [DPB]) stayed attaching to the substrate, and the rest swam if there was no water current; however, the attachment rates of the 10 and 30 DPB seahorses increased significantly in the high velocity treatment (P < 0.05). The ventilation rates decreased significantly with the increase of seahorse age under the high water current, regardless of whether they were swimming or attaching (P < 0.05). For all of the groups, the high water current could significantly decrease the total feeding frequency (TFF) and effective feeding frequency (EFF), with the swimming seahorses having a higher feeding frequency than that of the attaching seahorses. The young seahorses in the high water current treatment had lower growth rates and suffered total mortality by the end of 30 day experiment (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available