4.4 Article

Coccolithophores do not increase particulate carbon production under nutrient limitation: A case study using Emiliania huxleyi (PML B92/11)

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MARINE BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY
Volume 443, Issue -, Pages 155-161

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2013.02.040

Keywords

Batch culture; Continuous culture; Emiliania huxleyi; Nutrient limitation; Particulate inorganic carbon production; Particulate organic carbon production

Funding

  1. European Commission [211384]
  2. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [FKZ 03F0608]
  3. European Community's Seventh Framework Programme [265103]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [2010-NEWLOG ADG-267931 HE]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The coccolithophore Emiliania huxieyi (PML B92/11) was grown in batch culture under nitrogen (N) as well as phosphorus (P) limitation. Growth rate, particulate inorganic carbon (PIC), particulate organic carbon (POC), particulate organic nitrogen (PON), and particulate organic phosphorus (POP) production were determined. While PON production decreased by 96% under N-limitation and POP production decreased by 85% under P-limitation, growth rate decreased by 31% under N- and by 26% under P-limitation. POC production increased by a factor of 1.5 under N-limitation and by a factor of 3.3 under P-limitation. PIC production increased by a factor of 1.2 under N-limitation and did not change under P-limitation. It is concluded that the decrease in PON production under N-limitation and the decrease in POP production under P-limitation represent a physiological response of the cells while the increase in particulate carbon production represents a methodological artefact. The latter conclusion is based on a direct comparison of this strain's responses to nutrient limitation in different experimental setups, i.e., batch-, semi-continuous-, and continuous cultures. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available