4.8 Article

Hydrogen production by methanol steam reforming: Catalytic performance of supported-Pd on zinc-cerium oxides' nanocomposites

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
Volume 179, Issue -, Pages 262-275

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.05.030

Keywords

Fuel cells; Palladium dispersion; Palladium-zinc intermetallic; Clean energy

Funding

  1. ANPCyT of Argentina [PICT 2012 1280, PME 2006 311, PME 2003 8]
  2. Universidad Nacional del Litoral [CAID 2011 PI 50120110100311]
  3. CONICET

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two series of supported palladium catalysts (2 wt%) were prepared on ZnO-CeO2 nanocomposites (Zn-to-Ce atomic ratio between 0.5 and 2) obtained by oxalate or carbonate coprecipitation (OC and CC series, respectively). Methanol steam reforming (MSR) reaction was tested in a wide range of temperature (398-623 K) for CH3OH/H2O = 1/1 gas mixtures. Pd on pure CeO2 was only able to decompose methanol to CO, under 523 K, but the reverse water gas shift reaction took place at higher temperatures. The MSR reaction only occurred in the presence of zinc oxide and the selectivity to CO2 was higher for the CC series, due to the better dispersion of the ZnO phase over these carbonate-derived nanocomposites. Although the CO2 selectivity seems to be modulated by the reverse water gas shift reaction, the palladium supported on the mixed oxides was more stable than Pd/ZnO, which continuously deactivated. A detailed characterization by high resolution atomic microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and a novel carbon monoxide step chemisorption technique, proved the formation of bulk and surface PdZn alloying in the ternary catalyst, Pd supported on the nanosized ceria and zinc oxide supports. It is concluded that although a better catalytic stability was observed on the ZnO-CeO2 nanocomposites, the employment of temperatures higher than 450 K would impose an insurmountable limitation in terms of CO2 selectivity. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available