4.7 Article

Zinc isotopic fractionation in Phragmites australis in response to toxic levels of zinc

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
Volume 62, Issue 6, Pages 2169-2178

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erq414

Keywords

Isotope fractionation; MC-ICP-MS; metallomics; metals; nutrition; Phragmites australis; reed

Categories

Funding

  1. Imperial College of London
  2. Universitat de Barcelona via an APIF

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stable isotope signatures of Zn have shown great promise in elucidating changes in uptake and translocation mechanisms of this metal in plants during environmental changes. Here this potential was tested by investigating the effect of high Zn concentrations on the isotopic fractionation patterns of Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. Plants were grown for 40 d in a nutritive solution containing 3.2 mu M (sufficient) or 2 mM (toxic) Zn. The Zn isotopic composition of roots, rhizomes, shoots, and leaves was analysed. Stems and leaves were sampled at different heights to evaluate the effect of long-distance transport on Zn fractionation. During Zn sufficiency, roots, rhizomes, and shoots were isotopically heavy (delta Zn-66(JMC) (Lyon)=0.2 parts per thousand) while the youngest leaves were isotopically light (-0.5 parts per thousand). During Zn excess, roots were still isotopically heavier (delta Zn-66=0.5 parts per thousand) and the rest of the plant was isotopically light (up to -0.5 parts per thousand). The enrichment of heavy isotopes at the roots was attributed to Zn uptake mediated by transporter proteins under Zn-sufficient conditions and to chelation and compartmentation in Zn excess. The isotopically lighter Zn in shoots and leaves is consistent with long-distance root to shoot transport. The tolerance response of P. australis increased the range of Zn fractionation within the plant and with respect to the environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available