4.2 Article

How soon do allied health professionals lose confidence to perform EBP activities? A cross-sectional study

Journal

JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 603-612

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jep.13001

Keywords

allied health professionals; clinical confidence; evidence-based practice; research utilization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To explore if there is a relationship between allied health professionals' confidence to perform a range of evidence-based practice (EBP) activities and the time since they graduated from their entry-level degree and the presence of postgraduate qualifications. Design Cross-sectional survey. Setting Allied health professionals from two Australian public metropolitan health services, including acute, subacute, and community settings. Participants Sample of 288 (n = 288) allied health professionals from the disciplines of physiotherapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, social work, dietetics/nutrition, and other. Main outcome measure Cross-sectional survey including 12 questions measuring respondents' confidence to conduct a range of EBP activities. Results Allied health professionals begin to lose confidence related to EBP activities within the first 5 years of clinical practice, particularly for those activities involving critical analysis of published studies. Respondents with postgraduate qualifications were more likely to report greater confidence with EBP activities, suggesting that higher level qualifications protect against the effect of degradation of EBP skills and confidence over time. Conclusions Allied health professionals' confidence to perform EBP activities degrades over time, particularly for those individuals with no postgraduate qualifications. Registration and accreditation bodies along with allied health professional employers should explore potential strategies to preserve and enhance EBP skills, confidence, and behaviours.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available