4.2 Article

Using vote cards to encourage active participation and to improve critical appraisal skills in evidence-based medicine journal clubs

Journal

JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages 827-831

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01711.x

Keywords

active participation; critical appraisal skills; evidence-based medicine journal clubs; vote cards

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rationale, aims and objectives Evidence-based medicine (EBM) journal clubs are used by health care practitioners to critique and remain updated on relevant health literature. Vote cards, in three different colours (green/yellow/red), allow participants to express their opinions (agree/doubt/reject) on the quality and possibility of clinical application regarding the article being reviewed. Our aim is to assess the efficacy of using vote cards in EBM journal clubs. Methods Evidence-based medicine journal club is held on a weekly basis in the Department of Surgery in Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taiwan. The participants of EBM journal clubs include medical students, resident doctors and primary care faculty members. After the presentation, participants use their vote cards to critically appraise the literature and decide if the rationales could be applied in their own practice. After a 12-week period, we evaluated the effectiveness of the vote cards based on survey findings of the participants. Results The majority of 66 respondents agreed that vote cards can improve the overall quality of EBM journal clubs, may encourage active participation and improve critical appraisal skills. They also rated the vote cards more favourably than traditional hand voting and agree that vote cards should be used in future EBM journal clubs. Conclusion We suggest the regular and routine use of vote cards in EBM journal clubs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available