4.6 Article

Is gender inequality in the domestic sphere associated with psychological distress among women and men? Results from the Northern Swedish Cohort

Journal

JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH
Volume 66, Issue 3, Pages 271-276

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jech.2010.109231

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swedish Council for Social Research, Stockholm, Sweden
  2. National Graduate School for Gender Studies at Umea Centre for Gender Studies, Umea University, Umea, Sweden

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim The aim of this study was to analyse whether gender inequality in the domestic sphere was associated with psychological distress among women and men. Methods In a cohort study, all pupils in the last year of compulsory school in a middle-sized industrial town in northern Sweden were followed until the age of 42. For this study a sample of cohabiting participants (n=372 women, 352 men) was selected. Gender inequality was measured as perceptions of gender inequality in the couple relationship, time spent on household work, responsibility for domestic work and childcare, and was analysed in relation to psychological distress, after taking possible background variables as well as earlier health status into account. Results In the multivariate analyses, perception of gender inequality in the couple relationship was associated with psychological distress for both women (OR 2.23, CI 1.20 to 4.18) and men (OR 3.51, CI 1.69 to 7.31). For women only, taking whole responsibility for domestic work was associated with the outcome (OR 2.17, CI 1.05 to 4.48). For men, taking less than half of the responsibility for domestic work was associated with psychological distress (OR 2.25, CI 1.24 to 3.91). Conclusions Gender inequality in the domestic sphere seems to be an important determinant of psychological distress for both women and men.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available