4.2 Article

Comparative sorption and desorption behaviors of PFHxS and PFOS on sequentially extracted humic substances

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Volume 26, Issue 12, Pages 2517-2525

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2014.04.009

Keywords

Perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHxS); Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS); Humic substances (HSs); Sorption; Desorption

Funding

  1. Chinese Natural Science Foundation [21277077, 21325730]
  2. Ministry of Education [20130031130005]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology [2012ZX07529-003]
  4. Ministry of Education Innovation Team [IRT 13024]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The sorption and desorption behaviors of two perfluoroalkane sulfonates (PFSAs), including perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHxS) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) on two humic acids (HAs) and humin (HM), which were extracted from a peat soil, were investigated. The sorption kinetics and isotherms showed that the sorption of PFOS on the humic substances (HSs) was much higher than PFHxS. For the same PFSA compound, the sorption on HSs followed the order of HM > HA2 > HA1 These suggest that hydrophobic interaction plays a key role in the sorption of PFSAs on HSs. The sorption capacities of PFSAs on HSs were significantly related to their aliphaticity, but negatively correlated to aromatic carbons, indicating the importance of aliphatic groups in the sorption of PFSAs. Compared to PFOS, PFHxS displayed distinct desorption hysteresis, probably due to irreversible pore deformation after sorption of PFHxS. The sorption of the two PFSAs on HSs decreased with an increase in pH in the solution. This is ascribed to the electrostatic interaction and hydrogen bonding at lower pH. Hydrophobic interaction might also be stronger at lower pH due to the aggregation of HSs. (c) 2014 The Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available