4.4 Article

Nitrate Concentration Trends in Iowa's Rivers, 1998 to 2012: What Challenges Await Nutrient Reduction Initiatives?

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages 1822-1828

Publisher

AMER SOC AGRONOMY
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2013.03.0111

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Iowa Department of Natural Resources

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N) concentrations threaten water supplies and contribute to impairments of surface water resources. In this study, we analyzed concentration trends at 60 ambient river monitoring sites in Iowa for the years 1998 to 2012 to assess the presence of linear trends in the NO3-N concentration data using a time-series method that accounted for temporal correlation and combined the trend information from individual sites into an assessment of the state-wide rate of change in river NO3-N concentrations. Forty-six of the sites had sufficient records for trend analysis. Study results indicated that 37 out of 46 sites (80%) did not have statistically significant trends over the monitoring period (p > 0.1). Six monitoring sites in western Iowa had statistically significant increasing trends (p < 0.05), and three additional sites located in western and southern Iowa showed nominally significant increasing trends (p < 0.1). The rate of statistically significant increases ranged from 0.15 to 0.33 mg L-1 yr(-1). Aggregated across the state, the overall trend of NO3-N concentrations in Iowa rivers is increasing, with an average and median rate of 0.05 and 0.03 mg L-1 yr(-1), respectively. Increasing concentration is likely associated with increasing trends in fertilizer sales and animal production, but better tracking is needed to establish a definitive relation. Reducing NO3-N concentrations using conservation practices is a major focus of the recently proposed Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy, and our study provides an important milestone preceding implementation of the strategy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available