4.0 Article

Evaluation of PAH diagnostic ratios as source apportionment tools for air particulates collected in an urban-industrial environment

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 417-424

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b909660d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ontario Ministry of the Environment
  2. NSERC Discovery
  3. Great Lakes Sustainability Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A variety of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) diagnostic ratios were examined as source apportionment tools in the analysis of a PAH data set associated with atmospheric particulate matter collected in an urban-industrial environment. Seventy-six PM10 samples were collected concurrently at 4 sampling sites over a one-month period in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, a city of 500 000 people that is home to two integrated steel companies, associated industries and a network of roadways and major highways. Samples collected under well defined meteorological conditions were categorized as being 'upwind' or 'downwind' of the industrial sector. All sample extracts were analyzed for 48 parent PAH, methylphenanthrenes and sulfur-containing aromatics and showed a thousand-fold range of total PAH concentrations (0.23-172 ng m(-3)). Of all PAH diagnostic ratios examined, the two most useful were the anthracene/(anthracene+phenanthrene) and benz[a]anthracene/(benz[a] anthracene+chrysene/triphenylene) ratios. These afforded the best discrimination of samples that had significant industrial impacts. This work is the first example of the use of a linear combination of PAH ratios, coupled with total PAH data and well defined local samples to determine the relative impacts of mobile and industrial emissions in an urban-industrial environment. Use of a linear combination of PAH ratios allowed us to categorize 95% of the data as 'upwind' or 'downwind' of the industrial sector. It is important to determine PAH ratio threshold values based on data from well defined local samples rather than relying on literature values alone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available