4.4 Article

Waste products as alternative phosphorus fertilisers part II: predicting P fertilisation effects by chemical extraction

Journal

NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages 187-199

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10705-015-9731-4

Keywords

Prediction; Standard soil test; Soil pH; Meat bone meal; Wood ash; Digestate

Categories

Funding

  1. research project CenBio (Bioenergy Innovation Centre) [193817]
  2. research project Innovative utilization of wood ash [215935]
  3. research project Sustained and increased organic cereal production by improved nutrient supply and pest control [207686]
  4. Research Council of Norway

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Knowledge of the relative agronomic P efficiency (RAE) of waste products compared with mineral fertiliser is essential for establishing reliable fertilisation plans. This creates the demand for an evaluation of laboratory methods that can predict RAE of waste products. In this study we compared eight chemical extraction methods in terms of their ability to predict readily-available P and late-season P fertilisation effects of a wide range of waste products (two biomass ashes, meat bone meal, fish sludge, catering waste, two food waste-based digestate products) at two soil pH levels, approximately pH 5.5 (pH level 1) and pH 6.9 (pH level 2). Extractable P was correlated with RAE determined in a bioassay with ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) and a nutrient-deficient sand-peat mixture as model soil. At pH level 1, P extraction with 0.005 M CaCl2 and simultaneous adsorption to iron-oxide impregnated filter paper predicted RAE best at harvest 1 and neutral ammonium citrate predicted RAE best as the sum of harvests 2, 3 and 4. At pH level 2, 0.5 M NaHCO3 (pH 8.5, Olsen P) was the only extraction method that was significantly correlated with RAE at harvest 1 and the sum of harvests 2, 3 and 4, because all other extractions overestimated RAE of waste products containing stable calcium phosphates. The optimum extraction method thus depends on whether readily-available P or late-season P fertilisation effects are being predicted and on the pH of the target soil.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available