4.6 Article

Comparative Fitness of Irradiated Light Brown Apple Moths (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in a Wind Tunnel, Hedgerow, and Vineyard

Journal

JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY
Volume 104, Issue 4, Pages 1301-1308

Publisher

ENTOMOLOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1603/EC10394

Keywords

Tortricidae; Epiphyas postvittana; sterile insect technique; eradication; radiation

Categories

Funding

  1. USDA-ARS
  2. USDA-APHIS
  3. IAEA
  4. Foundation for Research Science and Technology [C02X0501]
  5. CRC for National Plant Biosecurity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Light brown apple moth, Epiphyas postvittana (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), is the target of the sterile insect technique, but reduced moth fitness from irradiation lowers the effective overflooding ratio of sterile to wild moths. New measures of insect quality are being sought to improve field performance of irradiated insects, thus improving the cost effectiveness of this technique. Male pupae were irradiated at intervals between 0 and 300 Gy, and adult flight success was assessed in a wind tunnel equipped with flight track recording software. A dose response was evident with reduced successful search behaviors at higher irradiation doses. Irradiation at 250 Gy reduced arrival success to 49% of untreated controls, during 2-min assays. Mark-release-recapture of males irradiated at 250 Gy indicated reduced male moth recapture in hedgerows (75% of control values of 7.22% +/- 1.20 [SEM] males recaptured) and in vineyards (78% of control values 10.5% +/- 1.66% [SEM] recaptured). Males dispersed similar distances in both habitats, and overflooding ratios dropped off rapidly from the release point in both landscapes. Transects of traps with central releases proved to be an efficient method for measuring the quality of released males. Relative field performance of moths was greater than suggested by wind tunnel performance, which could be due to time differences between the two assays, two-minute wind tunnel tests compared with days in the field treatments. Release strategies involving ground releases should consider the effect of limited postrelease dispersal. Aerial release could solve this problem and warrants investigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available