Why weight? Modelling sample and observational level variability improves power in RNA-seq analyses
Published 2015 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Why weight? Modelling sample and observational level variability improves power in RNA-seq analyses
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 43, Issue 15, Pages e97-e97
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Online
2015-04-30
DOI
10.1093/nar/gkv412
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies
- (2015) Matthew E. Ritchie et al. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
- A comprehensive assessment of RNA-seq accuracy, reproducibility and information content by the Sequencing Quality Control Consortium
- (2014) NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
- Normalization of RNA-seq data using factor analysis of control genes or samples
- (2014) Davide Risso et al. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
- svaseq: removing batch effects and other unwanted noise from sequencing data
- (2014) Jeffrey T. Leek NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
- Robustly detecting differential expression in RNA sequencing data using observation weights
- (2014) Xiaobei Zhou et al. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
- Dissemination of scientific software with Galaxy ToolShed
- (2014) Daniel Blankenberg et al. GENOME BIOLOGY
- voom: precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts
- (2014) Charity W Law et al. GENOME BIOLOGY
- featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features
- (2013) Y. Liao et al. BIOINFORMATICS
- Epigenetic Functions of Smchd1 Repress Gene Clusters on the Inactive X Chromosome and on Autosomes
- (2013) Anne-Valerie Gendrel et al. MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
- The Subread aligner: fast, accurate and scalable read mapping by seed-and-vote
- (2013) Yang Liao et al. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
- Smchd1 regulates a subset of autosomal genes subject to monoallelic expression in addition to being critical for X inactivation
- (2013) Arne W Mould et al. Epigenetics & Chromatin
- Epigenetic Regulator Smchd1 Functions as a Tumor Suppressor
- (2012) H. S. Leong et al. CANCER RESEARCH
- Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation
- (2012) Davis J. McCarthy et al. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
- From RNA-seq reads to differential expression results
- (2011) Alicia Oshlack et al. GENOME BIOLOGY
- ROAST: rotation gene set tests for complex microarray experiments
- (2010) Di Wu et al. BIOINFORMATICS
- baySeq: Empirical Bayesian methods for identifying differential expression in sequence count data
- (2010) Thomas J Hardcastle et al. BMC BIOINFORMATICS
- Control of mammary stem cell function by steroid hormone signalling
- (2010) Marie-Liesse Asselin-Labat et al. NATURE
- Biases in Illumina transcriptome sequencing caused by random hexamer priming
- (2010) Kasper D. Hansen et al. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
- A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data
- (2010) Mark D Robinson et al. GENOME BIOLOGY
- Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences
- (2010) Jeremy Goecks et al. GENOME BIOLOGY
- Testing significance relative to a fold-change threshold is a TREAT
- (2009) D. J. McCarthy et al. BIOINFORMATICS
- edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data
- (2009) M. D. Robinson et al. BIOINFORMATICS
- Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Panobinostat Induces Clinical Responses with Associated Alterations in Gene Expression Profiles in Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma
- (2008) L. Ellis et al. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started