4.3 Article

Micellization of sodium dodecyl sulfate in glycerol aqueous mixtures

Journal

JOURNAL OF DISPERSION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages 266-273

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01932690701707571

Keywords

sodium dodecyl sulfate; micellization; glycerol-water mixtures; conductance; fluorescence probe studies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of glycerol on both micellar formation and the structural evolution of the sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) aggregates in the context of the action mechanism of the cosolvent has been studied. The critical micelle concentration and the degree of counterion dissociation of the surfactant over a temperature range from 20 degrees C to 40 degrees C were obtained by the conductance method. The thermodynamic parameters of micellization were estimated by using the equilibrium model of micelle formation. The analysis of these parameters indicated that the lower aggregation of the surfactant is mainly due to a minor cohesive energy of the mixed solvent system in relation to the pure water. The effect of glycerol on the mean aggregation number of the micelles of SDS was analyzed by the static quenching method. It was found that the aggregation number decreased with the glycerol content. This reduction in the micellar size seems to be controlled by an increase in the surface area per headgroup, which was ascribed to a participation of glycerol in the micellar solvation layer. Studies on the micropolarity of the aggregates, as sensed by the probe pyrene, indicated that this microenvironmental parameter is almost unaffected by the presence of glycerol in the mixture. However, an increase in the micellar microviscosity at the surface region was observed from the photophysical behavior of two different probes, rhodamine B and auramine O. These results suggest a certain interaction of the cosolvent in the micellar solvation of SDS micelles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available