4.4 Article

Role of bile reflux and Helicobacter pylori infection on inflammation of gastric remnant after distal gastrectomy

Journal

JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages 208-212

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-2980.2008.00348.x

Keywords

bile reflux; gastrectomy; gastritis; Helicobacter pylori

Funding

  1. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project [Y0205]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: The influence of the main pathogenic factors on remnant gastritis is still to be evaluated. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of bile reflux and Helicobacter pylori infection on endoscopic inflammation and histological changes of gastric remnant after distal gastrectomy. METHODS: A total of 281 patients with a more than 1-year history of distal gastrectomy were retrospectively involved after excluding those with tumors and ulcers on endoscopy. The severity of endoscopic remnant gastritis and bile reflux were recorded during the endoscopy. The histological changes including chronic inflammation, activity, atrophy, intestinal metaplasia and H. pylori were evaluated independently. RESULTS: An endoscopic inflammation of remnant gastric mucosae was found in 81.1% (228/281) of the patients. The prevalence of H. pylori infection and bile reflux in patients with endoscopic remnant gastritis was more common than in those without gastritis (21.5% vs 0%, 88.6% vs 24.5%, P < 0.0001). The score of histological chronic inflammation was significantly higher in patients with bile reflux than in those without obvious bile reflux (1.65 vs 1.45, P = 0.02). Chronic inflammation (1.82 vs 1.57), activity (0.78 vs 0.34), atrophy (0.67 vs 0.41) and intestinal metaplasia (0.67 vs 0.27) in H. pylori-positive patients were all significantly more severe than in H. pylori-negative patients. CONCLUSION: Bile reflux and H. pylori infection exacerbates the severity of endoscopic remnant gastritis and chronic histological inflammation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available