4.3 Article

Ustekinumab dosing, persistence, and discontinuation patterns in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis

Journal

JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 113-120

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/09546634.2014.883059

Keywords

Discontinuation; dosing; persistence; ustekinumab

Categories

Funding

  1. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Ustekinumab is the most recently approved biologic for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Real-world dosing patterns of ustekinumab are yet to be fully characterized. Methods: A retrospective, observational study was conducted using MarketScan Commercial and Medicare databases. A cohort of psoriasis patients treated with ustekinumab between 25 September 2009 and 31 October 2010 was evaluated. Main outcomes included ustekinumab dosing and treatment patterns. Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated to adjust for the censoring of data. Subgroup analysis was conducted for biologic-experienced patients and biologic-naive patients. Results: One thousand ustekinumab patients were included, of whom 60% were biologic-experienced. The average age was 49.0 and 53.9% were male. 63.3% of patients initiated ustekinumab with a 45mg dose and 34.5% initiated with a 90mg dose. Mean (median) days from initial dose to second dose was 31.1 (28.0). During maintenance therapy, dose intervals spanned from 80.6 to 81.2 (84.0) days. About 81.4% of patients were persistent during the variable-length follow-up period. Conclusions: The majority of patients received the 45mg ustekinumab dose. The mean dosing intervals were consistent with the US prescribing guidelines. Biologic-naive and biologic-experienced patients had similar dosing patterns. Ustekinumab treatment achieved a persistency rate as high as 81.4% over an average of 186.5 (SD 114.2) days of follow-up.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available