4.8 Article

Global analysis of RNA cleavage by 5'-hydroxyl RNA sequencing

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 43, Issue 17, Pages E108-U18

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv536

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Damon Runyon-Rachleff Innovation award
  2. Research Scholar Grant from the American Cancer Society
  3. National Institutes of Health Training [T32 GM008730]
  4. University of Colorado Cancer Center Grant [P30 CA046934]
  5. Internal University funds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

RNA cleavage by some endoribonucleases and self-cleaving ribozymes produces RNA fragments with 5' - hydroxyl (5'-OH) and 2',3'-cyclic phosphate termini. To identify 5'-OH RNA fragments produced by these cleavage events, we exploited the unique ligation mechanism of Escherichia coli RtcB RNA ligase to attach an oligonucleotide linker to RNAs with 5'-OH termini, followed by steps for library construction and analysis by massively parallel DNA sequencing. We applied the method to RNA from budding yeast and captured known 5'-OH fragments produced by tRNA Splicing Endonuclease (SEN) during processing of intron-containing pre-tRNAs and by Ire1 cleavage of HAC1 mRNA following induction of the unfolded protein response (UPR). We identified numerous novel 5'-OH fragments derived from mRNAs: some 5'-OH mRNA fragments were derived from single, localized cleavages, while others were likely produced bymultiple, distributed cleavages. Many 5'-OH fragments derived from mRNAs were produced upstream of codons for highly electrostatic peptides, suggesting that the fragments may be generated by co-translational mRNA decay. Several 5'-OH RNA fragments accumulated during the induction of the UPR, some of which share a common sequence motif that may direct cleavage of these mRNAs. This method enables specific capture of 5'-OH termini and complements existing methods for identifying RNAs with 2',3'-cyclic phosphate termini.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available