4.6 Article

Clinical significance of the expression of c-Ski and SnoN, possible mediators in TGF-β resistance, in primary cutaneous melanoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Volume 53, Issue 1, Pages 26-33

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2008.07.010

Keywords

C-Ski; SnoN; Melanoma; TGF-beta resistance

Categories

Funding

  1. Fund for Scientific Research-Flanders [G.0128.06]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Loss of TGF-beta growth control is Considered as a hallmark of several human neoplasms including melanoma. Resistance of cancer cells to TGF-beta has been linked to mutations in proteins involved in the TGF-beta pathway. In melanoma such mutations have not been observed. C-Ski and SnoN, two structurally and functionally highly homologous proteins, are known as negative regulators in the TGF-beta signaling pathway. C-Ski and SnoN expression levels and subcellular localization have been associated with clinicopathological parameters and turnout Progression in several human malignancies. In melanoma cell lines, high c-Ski and SnoN expression levels have been described. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of c-Ski and SnoN expression in primary Cutaneous melanoma. Methods: We evaluated c-Ski and SnoN expression by immunohistochemical staining in 120 primary melanomas. Possible associations between c-Ski and SnoN staining patterns and clinicopathological parameters were analyzed. Results: Nuclear c-Ski expression was significantly associated with thicker and ulcerated tumours. The percentage of SnoN positivity was higher in ulcerated tumours and in the sentinel node positive group. Conclusion: These results suggest that c-Ski and SnoN, mediators in TGF-beta resistance, might be implicated in melanoma growth and progression. (c) 2008 Japanese Society for Investigative Dermatology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available