Journal
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages 118-122Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.09.010
Keywords
Ceramic; Alumina; Sandblasting; Rocatec; Roughness; AFM; Surfaces treatments; Silica coating; Nd:YAG laser; Abrasion
Categories
Funding
- CICYT/FEDER [MAT2008-02347, JA-P07-CTS-2568, JA-P08-CTS-3944]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different treatments on the surface roughness of in-Ceram Alumina (VITA, Sackingen, Germany). Methods: The ceramic blocks were polished (4000 grit) and sandblasted (SB) with airborne particle abrasion Al2O3; 110 mu m particle size; 2.8 bar; 20 s. The following treatments were performed: (1) no treatment; (2) Rocatec System (RC): after SB treatment, sandblasting with silica powder; 30 mu m particle size; 2.8 bar; 20 s. (3) Neodymium:yttrium-aluminium-gamet (Nd:YAG) laser (ND) application of graphite powder (stain) on the ceramic surface and Nd:YAG laser irradiation (distance: 1 mm, 100 mJ, 20 Hz, 2 W, and 141.54 J/cm(2)). (4) Nd:YAG laser plus Rocatec System: after ND treatments, RC was applied. Digital images (20 mu m x 20 mu m) from the surfaces were obtained by means of an AFM microscope in taping mode (Nanoscope IIIa, Digital Instruments). Roughness was measured in 10 mu m x 10 mu m boxes. Roughness (R-a) data (nm) were analyzed by one-way ANOVA (p < 0.05). Results: No differences in ceramic surfaces roughness occurred after any of the tested treatments (p = 0.54). Conclusions: High-alumina ceramic surface roughness was not increased with any of the tested treatments. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available