4.6 Article

Random biopsies during surveillance colonoscopy increase dysplasia detection in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and ulcerative colitis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CROHNS & COLITIS
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages 974-981

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.crohns.2013.02.009

Keywords

Colonoscopy; Dysplasia; Random biopsies; Inflammatory bowel disease; Ulcerative colitis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and aim: Patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are at increased risk of colon dysplasia. The role of random vs. target biopsies in these patients has not been investigated. Our aim was to evaluate the yield and clinical impact of random biopsies during surveillance colonoscopies in patients with PSC-UC. Methods: Data from 71 patients (267 colonoscopies) with PSC and UC, who underwent surveillance colonoscopies and followed-up from 2001 to 2011 was obtained. Colonoscopy and pathology reports were reviewed to assess the yield of random biopsies. Results: A total of 3975 (median 12) random biopsies were taken during surveillance colonoscopies. Overall, neoplasia was detected in 22 colonoscopies (16 patients): in 8 colonoscopies (36.4%) by targeted biopsies only and in 4 (18.2%) by both targeted and random biopsies. Neoplasia was detected in random biopsies only in 10 (45.5%) colonoscopies in 8 patients. On multivariate analysis, duration of UC (Odds ratio [OR] = 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.81; P = 0.01), number of random biopsies (per increase by 8) (OR = 1.64; 95% CI, 1.18-2.28; P = 0.003) and target biopsies during colonoscopy (OR = 9.08; 95% CI, 3.18-26.0; P < 0.001) independently predicted the presence of dysplasia; endoscopic features of prior inflammation did not. Conclusions: Random biopsies significantly increase the yield of dysplasia in patients with PSC and UC even in the absence of endoscopic features of prior inflammation and significantly impact clinical outcomes. (C) 2013 European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available