4.6 Article

Appropriate maintenance treatment for Crohn's disease: Results of a multidisciplinary international expert panel - EPACT II

Journal

JOURNAL OF CROHNS & COLITIS
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages 241-249

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.crohns.2009.05.002

Keywords

Crohn's disease; Therapy; Maintenance treatment; Appropriateness; RAND Appropriateness Method; Inflammatory bowel disease

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [3347CO-108792/1, PBLAP3-124341]
  2. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
  3. Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
  4. University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
  5. Abbott
  6. Essex Chemie AG
  7. UCB Pharma
  8. Nicomed
  9. Vifor pharma
  10. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PBLAP3-124341] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Biological. therapy has dramatically changed management of Crohn's disease (CD). New data have confirmed the benefit and relative long-term safety of anti-TNF alpha inhibition as part of a regular scheduled administration programme. The EPACT appropriateness criteria for maintenance treatment after medically-induced remission (MIR) or surgically-induced remission (SIR) of CD thus required updating. Methods: A multidisciplinary international expert panel (EPACT II, Geneva, Switzerland) discussed and anonymously rated detailed, explicit clinical indications based on evidence in the literature and personal expertise. Median ratings (on a 9-point scale) were stratified into three assessment categories: appropriate (7-9), uncertain (4-6 and/or disagreement) and inappropriate (1-3). Experts ranked appropriate medication according to their own clinical practice, without any consideration of cost. Results: Three hundred and ninety-two specific indications for maintenance treatment of CD were rated (200 for MIR and 192 for SIR). Azathioprine, methotrexate and/or anti-TNF alpha antibodies were considered appropriate in 42 indications, corresponding to 68% of all appropriate interventions (97% of MIR and 39% of SIR). The remaining appropriate interventions consisted of mesalazine and a wait-and-see strategy. Factors that influenced the panel's voting were patient characteristics and outcome of previous treatment. Results favour use of anti-TNF alpha agents after failure of any immunosuppressive therapy, while earlier primary use remains controversial. Conclusion: Detailed explicit appropriateness criteria (EPACT) have been updated for maintenance treatment of CD. New expert recommendations for use of the classic immunosuppressors as well as anti-TNF alpha agents are now freely available online (www.epact.ch). The validity of these criteria should now be tested by prospective evaluation. (C) 2009 European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available