4.5 Review

Prognosis of emergency department patients with suspected infection and intermediate lactate levels: A systematic review

Journal

JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages 334-339

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.12.017

Keywords

Infection; Lactate; Prognosis; Review

Funding

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [R01 GM103799]
  2. Emergency Medicine Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Previous studies have shown a correlation between blood lactate greater than 4.0 mmol/L and mortality in patients with suspected infection in the emergency department (ED), but data are more limited regarding the prognosis of intermediate blood lactate (2.0-3.9 mmol/L), particularly in the absence of hemodynamic instability. We sought to quantify the prognostic significance of intermediate blood lactate levels in ED patients with suspected infection, emphasizing patients without hypotension. Methods: A systematic review of 4 databases was conducted to identify studies using a comprehensive search strategy. All studies performed on adult ED patients with suspected infection and available data on hemodynamics, intermediate lactate levels, and mortality rates were included. Results: We identified 20 potential publications, 8 of which were included. Intermediate lactate elevation was found in 11062 patients with suspected or confirmed infection, 1672 (15.1%) of whom died. Subgroup analysis of normotensive patients demonstrated a mortality of 1561 (14.9%) of 10 442, with rates from individual studies between 3.2% and 16.4%. Conclusion: This systematic review found that among ED patients with suspected infection, intermediate lactate elevation is associated with a moderate to high risk of mortality, even among patients without hypotension. Physicians should consider close monitoring and aggressive treatment for such patients. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available