4.5 Article

Opinions of families, staff, and patients about family participation in care in intensive care units

Journal

JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 634-640

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.03.001

Keywords

Intensive care unit; Critical care; Family centered care; Family relations; Family nursing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose The aims of the study were to assess opinions of caregivers, families, and patients about involvement of families in the care of intensive care unit (ICU) patients to evaluate the prevalence of symptoms of anxiety and depression in family members and to measure family satisfaction with care Materials and Methods Between days 3 and 5, perceptions by families and ICU staff of family involvement in care were collected prospectively at a single center Family members completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and a satisfaction scale (Critical Care Family Needs Inventory) Nurses recorded care provided spontaneously by families Characteristics of patient-relative pairs (n = 101) and ICU staff (n = 45) were collected Patients described their perceptions of family participation in care during a telephone interview, 206 +/- 147 days after hospital discharge Results The numbers of patient-relative pairs for whom ICU staff reported favorable perceptions were 101 (100%) of 101 for physicians, 91(90%) for nurses and 95 (94%) for nursing assistants Only 4 (3 9%) of 101 families refused participation in care Only 14 (13 8%) of 101 families provided care spontaneously The HADS score showed symptoms of anxiety in 58 (58 5%) of 99 and of depression in 26 (26 2%) of 99 family members The satisfaction score was high (11 0 +/- 1 25) Among patients, 34 (77 2%) of 44 had a favorable perception of family participation in care Conclusions Families and ICU staff were very supportive of family participation in care Most patients were also favorable to care by family members (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available