4.2 Article

Consideration of Bone Regeneration Effect of Stem Cells: Comparison of Bone Regeneration Between Bone Marrow Stem Cells and Adipose-Derived Stem Cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 196-201

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000378

Keywords

Adipose-derived stem cell; bone marrow stem cell; bone regeneration

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Much controversy exists as to how stem cells efficiently differentiate and regenerate. To research how stem cell origin affects optimal differentiation and regeneration, the authors collected stem cells from bone marrow and fat and compared amounts of bone regeneration from both groups of cells. Methods: This study used 16 New Zealand white rabbits raised in similar surroundings and conditions. After collecting stem cells from bone marrow and fat, osteoblast generation was induced. In each rabbit, 2 craniectomies (10 x 10 mm) were made into each rabbit's calvarium, and 0.2 mL (1 x 10(6) cells/mL) of bone marrow-derived and adipose-derived stem cells were transplanted into each defect. After 3 and 5 weeks of transplantation, computed tomography was conducted. After 6 weeks, regenerated bone tissue was collected and measured for volume, and biopsy was performed. Results: Both bone marrow- and adipose-derived stem cells were effective in bone regeneration of the defect. Bone marrow stem cells demonstrated greater differentiation into osteoblasts, but there was no difference in the amount of measured regenerated bone volume after 6 weeks. Conclusions: Adipose-derived stem cells differentiate directly into osteoblasts less often than do bone marrow-derived stem cells. However, the total amount of regenerated bone is almost the same because of the effect of indirect bone regeneration. As adipose-derived stem cells are easily accessible and have the potential to abundantly proliferate into mesenchymal cells, they could be an effective bone regeneration material.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available