4.5 Article

Enhanced H-mode pedestals with lithium injection in DIII-D

Journal

NUCLEAR FUSION
Volume 55, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0029-5515/55/6/063018

Keywords

DIII-D; pedestal; H-mode; lithium

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Fusion Energy Sciences, using the DIII-D National Fusion Facility, a DOE Office of Science user facility [DE-AC02-09CH11466, DE-FC02-04ER54698, DE-AC05-00OR22725, DE-AC52-07NA27344, DE-FG02-99ER54917, DE-FG02-89ER53296]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Periods of edge localized mode (ELM)-free H-mode with increased pedestal pressure and width were observed in the DIII-D tokamak when density fluctuations localized to the region near the separatrix were present. Injection of a powder of 45 mu m diameter lithium particles increased the duration of the enhanced pedestal phases to up to 350 ms, and also increased the likelihood of a transition to the enhanced phase. Lithium injection at a level sufficient for triggering the extended enhanced phases resulted in significant lithium in the plasma core, but carbon and other higher Z impurities as well as radiated power levels were reduced. Recycling of the working deuterium gas appeared unaffected by this level of lithium injection. The ion scale, k(theta)rho(s) similar to 0.1-0.2, density fluctuations propagated in the electron drift direction with f similar to 80 kHz and occurred in bursts every similar to 1 ms. The fluctuation bursts correlated with plasma loss resulting in a flattening of the pressure profile in a region near the separatrix. This localized flattening allowed higher overall pedestal pressure at the peeling-ballooning stability limit and higher pressure than expected under the EPED model due to reduction of the pressure gradient below the 'ballooning critical profile'. Reduction of the ion pressure by lithium dilution may contribute to the long ELM-free periods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available