4.8 Article

Bystander protein protects potential vaccine-targeting ligands against intestinal proteolysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
Volume 137, Issue 2, Pages 98-103

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.03.015

Keywords

Cholera toxin B subunit (CTB); E. coli heat-labile enterotoxin 8 subunit (LTB); Ulex europaeus agglutinin I (UEA I); Degradation resistance; Gastro-intestinal tract

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation [FR 958/24, FR 958/5-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Endowing mucosal vaccines with ligands that target antigen to mucosal lymphoid tissues may improve immunization efficacy provided that the ligands withstand the proteolytic environment of the gastrointestinal tract until they reach their destination. Our aim was to investigate whether and how three renowned ligands - Ulex europaeus agglutinin I and the B subunits of cholera toxin and E. coli heat-labile enterotoxin - master this challenge. We assessed the digestive power of natural murine intestinal fluid (natIF) using assays for trypsin, chymotrypsin and pancreatic elastase along with a test for nonspecific proteolysis. The natlF was compared with simulated murine intestinal fluid (simIF) that resembled the trypsin, chymotrypsin and elastase activities of its natural counterpart but lacked or contained albumins as additional protease substrates. The ligands were exposed to the digestive fluids and degradation was determined. The studies revealed that (i) the three pancreatic endoproteases constitute only one third of the total protease activity of natIF and (ii) the ligands resist proteolysis in natlF and protein-enriched simIF over 3 h but (iii) are partially destroyed in simIF that lacks additional protease substrate. We assume that the proteins of natIF are preferred substrates for the intestinal proteases and thus can protect vaccine-targeting ligands from destruction. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available