4.5 Article

Impact of nonaqueous phase liquid (NAPL) source zone architecture on mass removal mechanisms in strongly layered heterogeneous porous media during soil vapor extraction

Journal

JOURNAL OF CONTAMINANT HYDROLOGY
Volume 100, Issue 1-2, Pages 58-71

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2008.05.006

Keywords

nonaqueous phase liquid (NAPL); NAPL mass transfer; multiphase flow; soil vapor extraction (SVE); STOMP

Funding

  1. Office of Science (BER)
  2. U.S. Department of Energy - Environmental Remediation Sciences Program (ERSP) [DE-FG02-06ER64207]
  3. Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL)
  4. United States Department of Energy (DOE)'s Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  5. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)
  6. Battelle Memorial Institute for the United States Department of Energy [DE-AC06-76RLO 1830]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An existing multiphase flow simulator was modified in order to determine the effects of four mechanisms on NAPL mass removal in a strongly layered heterogeneous vadose zone during soil vapor extraction (SVE): a) NAPL flow, b) diffusion and dispersion from low permeability zones, c) slow desorption from sediment grains, and d) rate-limited dissolution of trapped NAPL The impacts of water and NAPL saturation distribution, NAPL-type (i.e., free, residual, or trapped) distribution, and spatial heterogeneity of the permeability field on these mechanisms were evaluated. Two different initial source zone architectures (one with and one without trapped NAPL) were considered and these architectures were used to evaluate seven different SVE scenarios. For all runs, slow diffusion from low permeability zones that gas flow bypassed was a dominant factor for diminished SVE effectiveness at later times. This effect was more significant at high water saturation due to the decrease of gas-phase relative permeability. Transverse dispersion contributed to fast NAPL mass removal from the low permeability layer in both source zone architectures, but longitudinal dispersion did not affect overall mass removal time. Both slow desorption from sediment grains and rate-limited mass transfer from trapped NAPL only marginally affected removal times. However, mass transfer from trapped NAPL did affect mass removal at later time, as well as the NAPL distribution. NAPL flow from low to high permeability zones contributed to faster mass removal from the low permeability layer, and this effect increased when water infiltration was eliminated. These simulations indicate that if trapped NAPL exists in heterogeneous porous media, mass transfer can be improved by delivering gas directly to zones with trapped NAPL and by lowering the water content, which increases the gas relative permeability and changes trapped NAPL to free NAPL. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available