4.7 Article

A unified RANS-LES model: Computational development, accuracy and cost

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS
Volume 249, Issue -, Pages 249-274

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2013.03.066

Keywords

Stochastic turbulence model; RANS; LES; Unified RANS-LES models; Channel flow application

Funding

  1. UW Institute for Scientific Computation
  2. NASA's NRA research opportunities in aeronautics program [NNX12AJ71A]
  3. NASA [NNX12AJ71A, 43413] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Large eddy simulation (LES) is computationally extremely expensive for the investigation of wall-bounded turbulent flows at high Reynolds numbers. A way to reduce the computational cost of LES by orders of magnitude is to combine LES equations with Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations used in the near-wall region. A large variety of such hybrid RANS-LES methods are currently in use such that there is the question of which hybrid RANS-LES method represents the optimal approach. The properties of an optimal hybrid RANS-LES model are formulated here by taking reference to fundamental properties of fluid flow equations. It is shown that unified RANS-LES models derived from an underlying stochastic turbulence model have the properties of optimal hybrid RANS-LES models. The rest of the paper is organized in two parts. First, a priori and a posteriori analyses of channel flow data are used to find the optimal computational formulation of the theoretically derived unified RANS-LES model and to show that this computational model, which is referred to as linear unified model (LUM), does also have all the properties of an optimal hybrid RANS-LES model. Second, a posteriori analyses of channel flow data are used to study the accuracy and cost features of the LUM. The following conclusions are obtained. (i) Compared to RANS, which require evidence for their predictions, the LUM has the significant advantage that the quality of predictions is relatively independent of the RANS model applied. (ii) Compared to LES, the significant advantage of the LUM is a cost reduction of high-Reynolds number simulations by a factor of 0.07 Re-0.46. For coarse grids, the LUM has a significant accuracy advantage over corresponding LES. (iii) Compared to other usually applied hybrid RANS-LES models, it is shown that the LUM provides significantly improved predictions. (c) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available