4.7 Article

Modeling fuzzy multi-period production planning and sourcing problem with credibility service levels

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS
Volume 231, Issue 1, Pages 208-221

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2009.02.009

Keywords

Fuzzy programming; Production planning; Credibility service level; Approximation approach; Particle swarm optimization

Funding

  1. One Hundred Excellent and Innovative Talents in Colleges and Universities of Hebei Province,
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [A2008000563]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [70571021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A great deal of research has been done on production planning and sourcing problems, most of which concern deterministic or stochastic demand and cost situations and single period systems. in this paper, we consider a new class of multi-period production planning and sourcing problem with credibility service levels, in which a manufacturer has a number of plants and subcontractors and has to meet the product demand according to the credibility service levels set by its customers. In the proposed problem, demands and costs are uncertain and assumed to be fuzzy variables with known possibility distributions. The objective of the problem is to minimize the total expected cost, including the expected value of the sum of the inventory holding and production cost in the planning horizon. Because the proposed problem is too complex to apply conventional optimization algorithms, we suggest an approximation approach (AA) to evaluate the objective function. After that, two algorithms are designed to solve the proposed production planning problem. The first is a PSO algorithm combining the AA, and the second is a hybrid PSO algorithm integrating the AA, neural network (NN) and PSO. Finally, one numerical example is provided to compare the effectiveness of the proposed two algorithms. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available