4.4 Article

Endothelial nitric oxide synthase polymorphism and prognosis in systolic heart failure patients

Journal

NITRIC OXIDE-BIOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
Volume 47, Issue -, Pages 91-96

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.niox.2015.04.004

Keywords

Systolic heart failure; Nitric oxide; Polymorphism

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) gene single nucleotide polymorphism G894T is associated with thrombotic vascular diseases. However, its functional significance is controversial and data are scarce concerning its influence in heart failure (HF). Methods: We studied 215 patients with chronic systolic HF. DNA was analyzed for eNOS gene G894T polymorphism using PCR and DNA sequencing. Evaluation of clinical characteristics and analysis of factors associated with 2-year mortality were performed for the homozygous G-allele G894T variant (GG), relative to the TT and GT variants. Results: The genotype distributions of eNOS G894T alleles were: GG 135 patients (63%) and TT/GT 80 (37%). Two-year mortality was significantly higher in the GG variant (48%) than the combined TT/GT group (32%). The usage of nitrates was associated with increased 2-year mortality (HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.28-3.17; p = 0.003), which was most significant in the GG group treated with nitrates (73.5%) in comparison to the TT/GT group not treated with nitrates (34%); HR 2.75, 95% CI 1.57-4.79, P < 0.001. Conclusions: Homozygosity for the G allele of the eNOS G894T polymorphism was associated with worse survival in systolic HF patients, especially in those treated with nitrates. ENOS polymorphism may result in different mechanistic interactions in HF than in thrombotic vascular diseases, suggesting that overexpression of NO may be associated with deleterious effects in systolic HF. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available