4.6 Article

Evaluation of a polymerase chain reaction-electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry for the detection and subtyping of influenza viruses in respiratory specimens

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages 222-226

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2013.03.004

Keywords

Influenza; Mass spectrometry; Respiratory viruses; Multiplex PCR; Direct diagnosis

Categories

Funding

  1. Abbott
  2. Ibis Biosciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: PCR coupled to electrospray ionization mass spectrometry technology (PCR/ESI-TOF-MS) (PLEX-ID system, Abbott Ibis Biosciences) was developed to characterize microbial pathogens. Objectives: To evaluate the performance of the PLEX-ID flu detection (TM) kit for detecting Influenza viruses by comparison with the multiplex RespiFinder (R) Kit (PathoFinder). Study design: Acute-phase respiratory samples (n = 293) were analysed for this purpose. A subpopulation of influenza type A positive samples, identified with the RespiFinder (R) kit (n = 64), were subtyped with the RealTime ready Inf A/H1N1 Detection Set (R) (Roche Molecular Diagnostics) and results were compared to the PLEX-ID Flu Detection (TM) kit. Results: 274 samples gave concordant results (93.5%, p < 0.0001): 65 influenza A-positive, 18 influenza B-positive and 191 negative samples. Of these, 7 samples were PLEX-ID positive/RespiFinder (R) negative (5 influenza A and 2 influenza B) and 12 were PLEX-ID positive/RespiFinder (R) negative (10 influenza A and 2 influenza B). PLEX-ID showed one sample as an influenza A and B co-infection while the RespiFinder (R) assay showed it to be influenza A-positive. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the PLEX-ID (TM) system were 87.4%, 96.5%, 92.2% and 94.1% respectively. Thirteen of 19 discordant samples available for retesting were investigated further with the Anyplex (TM) II RV16 Detection kit (See-gene): seven were RespiFinder (R) concordant, while six were PLEX-ID (TM) concordant. Subtyping of 61/64 influenza A samples was concordant (95.3%): 55 were H1N1pdm09 and six were non-H1N1pdm09. Three samples gave negative PLEX-ID (TM) results (one H1N1pdm09 and two non-H1N1pdm09). Conclusions: PCR/ESI-TOF-MS technology showed good diagnostic performances to detect and subtype influenza viruses. (C) 2013 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available