4.6 Article

BK virus antibody titers and intensity of infections after renal transplantation

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages 184-189

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2008.06.009

Keywords

Polyomavirus; BK virus; BK-antibody; BK-viremia; Humoral immunity; Transplantation; Kidney

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [1 K24-02886]
  2. NKF [22 3062 38053]
  3. 2004 Amgen Renal Fellowship Award
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [K24DK002886] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [Z01NS003049, Z01NS001983] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The mean urine BK viral load in kidney transplant recipients increases with the intensity of infection as the infection progresses from transient viruria to sustained viremia. Objectives: This study investigated whether the intensity of infection is associated with the humoral immune response. Study design: We measured BKV-specific IgG antibody titers in stored samples obtained serially over a 1-year period from 70 kidney transplant recipients with BKV infection and 17 control recipients without active BKV infection. Results: The mean pre-transplant BKV antibody level was lower in recipients who developed viremia than the mean level in those who never developed viremia (p = 0.004). Mean antibody titers in recipients who never showed evidence of active BKV infection rose slightly after transplant despite immunosuppression. The magnitude of the rise in the mean antibody titers in recipients who developed active BKV infection correlated with the intensity of infection (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The mean antibody level increased in accordance with the intensity of the infection post-transplant. Pre-transplant seropositivity did not protect against sustained viremia and the antibody response was not associated with clearance of the virus. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available