4.8 Article

The effect of Young's modulus on the neuronal differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells

Journal

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
Volume 25, Issue -, Pages 253-267

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.07.008

Keywords

Young's modulus; Embryonic stem cells; Atomic force microscopy; Neuronal differentiation

Funding

  1. Innovative Manufacturing Research Centre (IMRC) in the United Kingdom
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) in the United Kingdom

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is substantial evidence that cells produce a diverse response to changes in ECM stiffness depending on their identity. Our aim was to understand how stiffness impacts neuronal differentiation of embryonic stem cells (ESC's), and how this varies at three specific stages of the differentiation process. In this investigation, three effects of stiffness on cells were considered; attachment, expansion and phenotypic changes during differentiation. Stiffness was varied from 2 kPa to 18 kPa to finally 35 kPa. Attachment was found to decrease with increasing stiffness for both ESC's (with a 95% decrease on 35 kPa compared to 2 kPa) and neural precursors (with a 83% decrease on 35 kPa). The attachment of immature neurons was unaffected by stiffness. Expansion was independent of stiffness for all cell types, implying that the proliferation of cells during this differentiation process was independent of Young's modulus. Stiffness had no effect upon phenotypic changes during differentiation for mESC's and neural precursors. 2 kPa increased the proportion of cells that differentiated from immature into mature neurons. Taken together our findings imply that the impact of Young's modulus on attachment diminishes as neuronal cells become more mature. Conversely, the impact of Young's modulus on changes in phenotype increased as cells became more mature. (C) 2015 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available