4.5 Article

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Light Therapy for Antepartum Depression

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 72, Issue 7, Pages 986-993

Publisher

PHYSICIANS POSTGRADUATE PRESS
DOI: 10.4088/JCP.10m06188blu

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Janssen-Cilag
  2. Eli Lilly, Switzerland
  3. Bristol-Myers Squibb SA, Switzerland
  4. Mepha Pharma AG, Switzerland
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation [3100A0-102190/1, 320000-114110]
  6. Velux Foundation Switzerland
  7. Buhlmann Laboratories, Allschwil, Switzerland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Affective disorder during pregnancy is a common condition requiring careful judgment to treat the depression while minimizing risk to the fetus. Following up on promising pilot trials, we studied the efficacy of light therapy. Method: Twenty-seven pregnant women with nonseasonal major depressive disorder according to DSM-IV (outpatients, university polyclinic) were randomly assigned to 7,000 lux fluorescent bright white or 70 lux dim red (placebo) light administered at home in the morning upon awakening for 1 h/d in a 5-week double-blind trial carried out between October 2004 and October 2008. Clinical state was monitored weekly with the 29-item Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) with Atypical Depression Supplement (SIGH-ADS). Changes of rating scale scores over time were analyzed with the general linear model. Differences from baseline of SIGH-ADS and 17-item HDRS scores at every time point were the dependent variables, time was the within-subjects factor, and treatment was the between-subjects factor. The model also included baseline score of depression and gestational age at intervention start. Results: The superiority of bright light over dim light placebo was shown for both SIGH-ADS (R-2 = 0.251; F-3,F-23 = 3.91; P < .05) and HDRS (R-2 = 0.338; F-3,F-23 = 5.42; P < .01) when analyzing the week-by-week change from baseline, and HDRS scores showed a significant interaction of treatment with time (F-4,F-92 = 2.91; P < .05). Categorical analysis revealed that the response rate (HDRS >= 50% improvement) at week 5 was significantly greater for bright light (81.3%, n = 16) than for placebo light (45.5%, n = 11) (P < .05). Remission (final score 8) was attained by 68.6% versus 36.4%, respectively (P < .05). Expectation ratings did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusions: Bright white light treatment for 5 weeks improved depression during pregnancy significantly more than placebo dim red light. The study provides evidence that light therapy, a simple, cost-effective antidepressant modality with minimal side effects for the mother and no known risk for the unborn child, may be a useful non-pharmacologic approach in this difficult situation. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01043289 J Clin Psychiatry 2011;72(7):986-993 (C) Copyright 2011 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available