4.3 Article

Visual acuity and pattern of visual field loss at presentation in pituitary adenoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages 735-740

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.01.005

Keywords

Chiasmal compression; Optic chiasm; Optic nerve; Pituitary adenoma; Pituitary tumour; Visual acuity; Visual field defect

Funding

  1. Allergan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Our purpose was to analyse the demographics, prevalence and pattern of visual field defects in patients with pituitary adenoma. We prospectively recruited 103 consecutive patients (206 eyes) presenting to a neurosurgical unit with pituitary adenoma. Ophthalmological examination and standard automated perimetry (Humphrey, 24-2 threshold) was performed. Severity of visual field defects was also assessed. The mean population age was 53.9 years (standard deviation = 15). Visual loss was the most common reason for presentation (39%) followed by endocrine abnormality (21%) and headache (15%). Patients with endocrine abnormality on presentation were 10.9 years younger than those presenting with visual loss (p = 0.001). Bitemporal defects were the most prevalent pattern (n = 22, 41%) followed by homonymous defects (n = 7, 13%). Of the patients with visual field loss, 33% had unilateral visual field defects. The mean visual acuity in those with bitemporal defects was 6/7.5 with half of these patients having 6/6 vision in both eyes. In conclusion, the majority of patients with pituitary adenoma have visual acuity better than 6/7.5 despite having visual field defects. While a bitemporal pattern of visual field loss is the most common, a significant proportion of patients had unilateral and altitudinal defects. Assessment of the visual field is essential to rule out chiasmal compression. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available