Lumbar microdiscectomy complication rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published 2015 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Lumbar microdiscectomy complication rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Neurosurgical Focus
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages E6
Publisher
Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
Online
2015-10-01
DOI
10.3171/2015.7.focus15281
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Microendoscopic versus Open Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Prospective Randomised Study
- (2016) Bhavuk Garg et al. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
- Surgical technique and effectiveness of microendoscopic discectomy for large uncontained lumbar disc herniations: a prospective, randomized, controlled study with 8 years of follow-up
- (2014) Mohamed Hussein et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- Microdiscectomy with and without insertion of interspinous device for herniated disc at the L5–S1 level
- (2014) Marcelo Galarza et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE
- Is Minimal Access Spine Surgery More Cost-effective Than Conventional Spine Surgery?
- (2014) Daniel Lubelski et al. SPINE
- A prospective study of the incidence and outcomes of incidental dural tears in microendoscopic lumbar decompressive surgery
- (2014) T. Tsutsumimoto et al. Bone & Joint Journal
- Microendoscopic discectomy in athletes
- (2013) Mitsunori Yoshimoto et al. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE
- Clinical results of XMR-assisted percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy
- (2013) Gun Choi et al. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
- Complications of endoscopic microdiscectomy using the EASYGO! system: is there any difference with conventional discectomy during the learning-curve period?
- (2012) Rubén Martín-Láez et al. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA
- Posterior endoscopic discectomy: Results in 300 patients
- (2012) Mohinder Kaushal et al. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics
- Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy ^|^mdash; Early Clinical Experience
- (2012) Yoshitaka HIRANO et al. NEUROLOGIA MEDICO-CHIRURGICA
- Benign Neurological Recovery with Low Recurrence and Low Peridural Fibrosis Rate in Pediatric Disc Herniations after Lumbar Microdiscectomy
- (2012) Sevinç Çelik et al. PEDIATRIC NEUROSURGERY
- A Comparison of Acute Hospital Charges After Tubular versus Open Microdiskectomy
- (2012) Kevin S. Cahill et al. World Neurosurgery
- A 10-Year Follow-Up Study on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Lumbar Microendoscopic Discectomy
- (2012) M. Wang et al. Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A-Central European Neurosurgery
- Recovery of muscle strength after microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective cohort study with 1-year follow-up
- (2011) Greger Lønne et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- Lumbar microdiscectomy in pediatric patients: a large single-institution series
- (2011) Kevin S. Cahill et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE
- Long-term Outcome After Microendoscopic Diskectomy for Lumbar Disk Herniation: A Prospective Clinical Study With a 5-Year Follow-up
- (2011) Roberto Casal-Moro et al. NEUROSURGERY
- Correlation Between Persistent Neurological Impairment and Clinical Outcome After Microdiscectomy for Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation
- (2011) Orlando Righesso et al. NEUROSURGERY
- Changes in Back Pain After Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Annuloplasty for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Prospective Study
- (2011) Kyung-Chul Choi et al. PAIN MEDICINE
- Higher risk of dural tears and recurrent herniation with lumbar micro-endoscopic discectomy
- (2010) Marco Teli et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- Lumbar microdiscectomy under epidural anaesthesia with the patient in the sitting position: A prospective study
- (2010) Nicola Nicassio et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE
- Minimally invasive compared to open microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation
- (2010) Darryl Lau et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE
- Percutaneous Endoscopic Discectomy
- (2010) Chan Wearn Benedict Peng et al. JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES
- Comparison of a minimally invasive procedure versus standard microscopic discotomy: a prospective randomised controlled clinical trial
- (2009) Jörg Franke et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- Tubular Diskectomy vs Conventional Microdiskectomy for SciaticaA Randomized Controlled Trial
- (2009) Mark P. Arts JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- STANDARD OPEN MICRODISCECTOMY VERSUS MINIMAL ACCESS TROCAR MICRODISCECTOMY
- (2009) Yu-Mi Ryang et al. NEUROSURGERY
- Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: clinical and quality of life outcomes with a minimum 2 year follow-up
- (2009) Chan WB Peng et al. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
- Timing of surgery in cauda equina syndrome with urinary retention: meta-analysis of observational studies
- (2008) W. Bradford DeLong et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE
- Open versus Minimally Invasive Lumbar Microdiscectomy: Comparison of Operative Times, Length of Hospital Stay, Narcotic Use and Complications
- (2008) J. Harrington et al. MINIMALLY INVASIVE NEUROSURGERY
- Operative results and learning curve: microscope-assisted tubular microsurgery for 1- and 2-level discectomies and laminectomies
- (2008) Karishma Parikh et al. Neurosurgical Focus
- Full-Endoscopic Interlaminar and Transforaminal Lumbar Discectomy Versus Conventional Microsurgical Technique
- (2008) Sebastian Ruetten et al. SPINE
- Surgical Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Disc Herniation
- (2008) James N. Weinstein et al. SPINE
- Prolonged conservative care versus early surgery in patients with sciatica caused by lumbar disc herniation: two year results of a randomised controlled trial
- (2008) Wilco C Peul et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started