4.3 Review

Diagnostic Thresholds for Ambulatory Blood Pressure Moving Lower: A Review Based on a Meta-Analysis-Clinical Implications

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages 377-381

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2008.07681.x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Union [IC15-CT98-0329-EPOGH, LSHM-CT-2006-037093]
  2. Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Vlaanderen, Ministry of the Flemish Community, Brussels, Belgium [G.0424.03, G.0575.06]
  3. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium [OT/99/28, OT/00/25, OT/05/49]
  4. Danish Heart Foundation [01-2-9-9A-22914]
  5. Beckett Fonden
  6. Lundbeck Fonden
  7. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [15790293, 17790381, 18390192, 18590587]
  8. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (Health Science Research Grants and Medical Technology Evaluation Research Grants)
  9. Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science [16.54041 and 18.54042]
  10. Japan Atherosclerosis Prevention Fund
  11. Uehara Memorial Foundation
  12. Takeda Medical Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Upper limits of normal ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) have been a matter of debate in recent years. Current diagnostic thresholds for ABP rely mainly on statistical parameters derived from reference populations. Recent findings from the International Database of Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Relation to Cardiovascular Outcome (IDACO) provide outcome-driven thresholds for ABP Rounded systolic/diastolic thresholds for optimal ABP were found to be 115/75 mm Hg for 24 hours, 120/80 mm Hg for daytime, and 100/65 mm Hg for nighttime. The corresponding rounded thresholds for normal ABP were 125/75 mm Hg, 130/85 mm Hg, and 110/70 mm Hg, respectively, and those for ambulatory hypertension were 130/80 mm Hg, 140/85 mm Hg, and 120/70 mm Hg. However, in clinical practice, any diagnostic threshold for blood pressure needs to be assessed in the context of the patient's overall risk profile. The IDACO database is therefore being updated with additional population cohorts to enable the construction of multifactorial risk score charts, which also include ABP. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008;10:377-381. (C)2008 Le Jacq

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available