4.6 Editorial Material

Prioritization of systematic reviews leads prioritization of research gaps and needs

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 66, Issue 5, Pages 522-523

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.007

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Strengthening systematic reviews in public health: guidance in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, 2nd edition

Miranda S. Cumpston, Joanne E. McKenzie, Vivian A. Welch, Sue E. Brennan

Summary: This article introduces the major revision in guidance for authors of systematic reviews in public health in the second edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, highlighting new guidance addressing key methodological challenges faced by authors.

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH (2022)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Which actionable statements qualify as good practice statements In Covid-19 guidelines? A systematic appraisal

Omar Dewidar, Tamara Lotfi, Miranda Langendam, Elena Parmelli, Zuleika Saz Parkinson, Karla Solo, Derek K. Chu, Joseph L. Mathew, Elie A. Akl, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, Reem A. Mustafa, Lorenzo Moja, Alfonso Iorio, Yuan Chi, Carlos Canelo-Aybar, Tamara Kredo, Justine Karpusheff, Alexis F. Turgeon, Pablo Alonso-Coello, Wojtek Wiercioch, Annette Gerritsen, Miloslav Klugar, Maria Ximena Rojas, Peter Tugwell, Vivian Andrea Welch, Kevin Pottie, Zachary Munn, Robby Nieuwlaat, Nathan Ford, Adrienne Stevens, Joanne Khabsa, Zil Nasir, Grigorios Leontiadis, Joerg J. Meerpohl, Thomas Piggott, Amir Qaseem, Micayla Matthews, Holger J. Schunemann

Summary: Statements that qualify as good practice statements (GPS) are common in COVID-19 guidelines but are characterized by unclear designation and development processes, and methodological weaknesses.

BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (2022)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Good or best practice statements: proposal for the operationalisation and implementation of GRADE guidance

Omar Dewidar, Tamara Lotfi, Miranda W. Langendam, Elena Parmelli, Zuleika Saz Parkinson, Karla Solo, Derek K. Chu, Joseph L. Mathew, Elie A. Akl, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, Reem A. Mustafa, Lorenzo Moja, Alfonso Iorio, Yuan Chi, Carlos Canelo-Aybar, Tamara Kredo, Justine Karpusheff, Alexis F. Turgeon, Pablo Alonso-Coello, Wojtek Wiercioch, Annette Gerritsen, Miloslav Klugar, Maria Ximena Rojas, Peter Tugwell, Vivian Andrea Welch, Kevin Pottie, Zachary Munn, Robby Nieuwlaat, Nathan Ford, Adrienne Stevens, Joanne Khabsa, Zil Nasir, Grigorios Leontiadis, Joerg Meerpohl, Thomas Piggott, Amir Qaseem, Micayla Matthews, Holger J. Schunemann

Summary: An evidence-based approach is the gold standard for health decision-making, but the use of the GRADE approach for strong recommendations is inappropriate in cases where the evidence is indirect. We found widespread use of GPS in COVID-19 related recommendations, but guideline developers failed to transparently report their development process. We propose improvements to the operationalization of the GRADE guidance for GPS, including a structured process and standardized reporting.

BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (2023)

Review Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary

PROTOCOL: Guidance for stakeholder engagement in guideline development: A systematic review

Jennifer Petkovic, Alison Riddle, Lyubov Lytvyn, Joanne Khabsa, Elie A. Akl, Vivian Welch, Olivia Magwood, Pearl Atwere, Ian D. Graham, Sean Grant, Denny John, Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi, Etienne Langlois, Reem A. Mustafa, Alex Todhunter-Brown, Holger Schunemann, Maureen Smith, Airton T. Stein, Tom Concannon, Peter Tugwell

Summary: This is a protocol for a Campbell systematic review that aims to identify, describe, and summarize existing guidance and methods for multistakeholder engagement throughout the health guideline development process.

CAMPBELL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2022)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

A multistakeholder development process to prioritize and translate COVID-19 health recommendations for patients, caregivers and the public. A case study of the COVID-19 recommendation map

Kevin Pottie, Maureen Smith, Micayla Matthews, Nancy Santesso, Olivia Magwood, Tamara Kredo, Sarah Scott, Kerin Bayliss, Ammar Saad, Rinila Haridas, Nicole Detambel, Ashley Motilall, Yvonne Tan, Sally Steinberg, Justyna Litynska, Bart Dietl, Alfonso Ioiri, Ludovic Reveiz, Vivian Welch, Miloslav Klugar, Lawrence Mbuagbaw, Maria Ximena Rojas, Ivan D. Florez, Tamara Lotfi, Amir Qaseem, Joseph L. Mathew, Elie A. Akl, Peter Tugwell, Holger J. Schunemann

Summary: This study aims to develop a digital communication tool to improve the implementation of COVID-19 recommendations. The study involves multi-stakeholder engagement and provides three plain language recommendation formats. The results indicate that this approach is effective in enhancing guideline communication and understanding.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2022)

Editorial Material Health Care Sciences & Services

Resources supporting trustworthy, rapid and equitable evidence synthesis and guideline development: results from the COVID-19 evidence network to support decision-making (COVID-END)

Michael McCaul, David Tovey, Taryn Young, Vivian Welch, Omar Dewidar, Mireille Goetghebeur, Tamara Kredo, Andrea C. Tricco, Rebecca E. Glover, Janice Tufte, Amir Qaseem, Reveiz Ludovic, Rebecca L. Morgan, Per Olav Vandvik, Ivan D. Florez

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2022)

Article Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary

PROTOCOL: Digital interventions to reduce social isolation and loneliness in older adults: An evidence and gap map

Vivian Welch, Elizabeth Tanjong Ghogomu, Victoria I. Barbeau, Elisabeth Boulton, Sabrina Boutin, Niobe Haitas, Dylan Kneale, Douglas M. Salzwedel, Roger Simard, Paul Herbert, Christopher Mikton

Summary: This is a protocol for conducting a systematic review on the effects of digital interventions in mitigating social isolation and/or loneliness among older adults, excluding hospital settings.

CAMPBELL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2022)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Research priority setting related to older adults: a scoping review to inform the Cochrane-Campbell Global Ageing Partnership work programme

Victoria Barbeau, Leen Madani, Abdulah Al Ameer, Elizabeth Tanjong Ghogomu, Deirdre Beecher, Monserrat Conde, Tracey E. Howe, Sue Marcus, Richard Morley, Mona Nasser, Maureen Smith, Jo Thompson Coon, Vivian A. Welch

Summary: This study aims to explore and map the findings of prior research priority-setting initiatives related to improving the health and well-being of older adults. A total of 64 studies met the inclusion criteria, with opinions gathered from various stakeholder groups. The study identified broad research topics and PICO priorities, with a focus on clinical outcomes and health-related behavioral interventions.

BMJ OPEN (2022)

Editorial Material Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary

Research-What is it good for? Absolutely nothing horizontal ellipsis unless it is used to inform policy and practice

Howard White, Vivian Welch

CAMPBELL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2022)

Review Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary

PROTOCOL: Effects of guaranteed basic income interventions on poverty-related outcomes in high-income countries: A systematic review

Anita Rizvi, Vivian Welch, Marcia Gibson, Patrick R. Labelle, Christina Pollard, George A. Wells, Elizabeth Kristjansson

Summary: This article presents the protocol for a Campbell systematic review, which aims to appraise and synthesize the available quantitative evidence on GBI interventions in high-income countries, in order to compare the relative effectiveness of specific forms of GBI for alleviating poverty.

CAMPBELL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2022)

Article Environmental Sciences

Biomodd: The integration of art into transdisciplinary research practices

Ulrike Kuchner, Mona Nasser, Pieter Steyaert, Diego S. Maranan, Zeynep Birsel, Agatha Haines, Ann Peeters, Angelo C. J. Vermeulen

Summary: This paper argues for the integration of collaborative art practice in transdisciplinary research to generate ideas and engage researchers and non-academic stakeholders. The authors analyze the virtual and in-person participation of members of a collective during an art installation to explore the process, methods, and ideation. They find that the hybrid mode facilitates a feedback loop of individual experimentation and online sharing.

GAIA-ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY (2023)

Article Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

'You learn to smile with your eyes', exploring the impact of enhanced personal protective equipment on primary care dental practitioners in the UK: An interpretative phenomenological study

Alexander R. Legge, Mona Nasser, Jos M. Latour

Summary: The study aimed to explore the perception of dental practitioners in primary care settings on the impact of enhanced personal protective equipment (PPE) on patient communication and wider clinical practice. Qualitative interviews were conducted with eight dental practitioners, and the data was analyzed using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). The findings revealed barriers to communication, physical and mental stressors caused by enhanced PPE, and the influence of enhanced PPE on clinical practice. Further research is needed to develop interventions and investigate the long-term impact of enhanced PPE on clinical practice post-COVID.

COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2023)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Equity issues rarely addressed in the development of COVID-19 formal recommendations and good practice statements: a cross-sectional study

Omar Dewidar, Mostafa Bondok, Leenah Abdelrazeq, Khadija Aliyeva, Karla Solo, Vivian Welch, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, Joseph L. Mathew, Glen Hazlewood, Kevin Pottie, Lisa Hartling, Dina Sami Khalifa, Stephanie Duda, Maicon Falavigna, Joanne Khabsa, Tamara Lotfi, Jennifer Petkovic, Sarah Elliot, Yuan Chi, Roses Parker, Elizabeth Kristjansson, Alison Riddle, Andrea J. Darzi, Olivia Magwood, Ammar Saad, Gabriel Radav, Ignacio Neumann, Mark Loeb, Ludovic Reveiz, Dominik Mertz, Thomas Piggott, Alexis F. Turgeon, Holger Schunemann, Peter Tugwell

Summary: Equity issues were rarely explicitly considered in the development of COVID-19 formal recommendations focused on specific disadvantaged populations. Guidance is needed to support the consideration of health equity in guideline development.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2023)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Can a replication revolution resolve the duplication crisis in systematic reviews?

Sathya Karunananthan, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Lara Maxwell, Phi-Yen Nguyen, Matthew J. Page, Jordi Pardo Pardo, Jennifer Petkovic, Brigitte Vachon, Vivian Andrea Welch, Peter Tugwell

BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (2023)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

How effects on health equity are assessed in systematic reviews of interventions

Vivian Welch, Omar Dewidar, Elizabeth Tanjong Ghogomu, Salman Abdisalam, Abdulah Al Ameer, Victoria Barbeau, Kevin Brand, Kisanet Kebedom, Maria Benkhalti, Elizabeth Kristjansson, Mohamad Tarek Madani, Alba M. Antequera Martin, Christine M. Mathew, Jessie McGowan, William McLeod, Hanbyoul Agatha Park, Jennifer Petkovic, Alison Riddle, Peter Tugwell, Mark Petticrew, Jessica Trawin, George A. Wells

Summary: This study explores the methods used by systematic reviewers to consider health equity in systematic reviews of effectiveness. The study finds that current methods mainly focus on evidence relevant to populations experiencing health inequity, subgroup analysis using PROGRESS-Plus factors, and assessment of effect gradient across PROGRESS-Plus. However, there is insufficient transparency and detail in reporting the methods. Therefore, improving conceptual clarity of health equity definition, providing sufficient detail, and transparent reporting of judgments required for applicability assessments are necessary.

COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2022)

No Data Available