Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 62, Issue 6, Pages 667-673Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.07.016
Keywords
Sensitivity; Predictive value; Validity; Self-report; Registration; Cardiovascular disease
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objective: We sought to clarify the validity of self-reported stroke and myocardial infarction (MI) among Japanese population, because information on the validity, particularly on the sensitivity, of self-reported cardiovascular disease is limited and may differ among countries. Study Design and Setting: Using the 10-year follow-up questionnaire and a stroke and MI registry in the Japan Public Health Center-based prospective study (JPHC Study) cohort (n = 91,186), we calculated sensitivity and positive predictive values of self-reported stroke and MI incidence over 10 years. Results: Sensitivity of self-reported incident stroke was 73%. and that for MI was 82%, positive predictive values were 57% for stroke and 43% for MI. The supplemental inclusion of self-reported angina pectoris increased the sensitivity of MI to 89%, but attenuated the positive predictive value to 18%. Sensitivity of self-reported stroke was highest for subarachnoid hemorrhage (88%), but did not differ greatly among other stroke subtypes, affected sites or size. Conclusion: Self-reported stroke and MI seem sensitive enough to use for exclusion of stroke and MI at baseline in Japanese cohort studies. However, self-report has too many false positives to be used as the only criterion for incident stroke and MI. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available