Non-Cochrane vs. Cochrane reviews were twice as likely to have positive conclusion statements: cross-sectional study

Published 2009 View Full Article

  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Publication Search
  4. Publication Details
Title
Non-Cochrane vs. Cochrane reviews were twice as likely to have positive conclusion statements: cross-sectional study
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 62, Issue 4, Pages 380-386.e1
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Online
2009-01-07
DOI
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.008

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Protocol

Community support

Reagent

Community support

Reprint

Contact the author

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now
Webinars Posters Questions Hubs Funding Journals Articles Connect Collections Reviewers About Us FAQs Mobile App Privacy Policy Terms of Use
© Peeref 2019-2024. All rights reserved.