4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Diagnostic E-codes for commonly used, narrow therapeutic index medications poorly predict adverse drug events

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 61, Issue 6, Pages 561-571

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.08.003

Keywords

adverse drug events; patient safety; ICD-9 CM codes; E-codes; diagnostic coding; validation study

Funding

  1. AHRQ HHS [P01-HS11530] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [5-F32-AG-026180, K23-AG-000987, K08-AG-021527] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [K24-DK-002651] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: We sought to examine the validity of specific hospital discharge codes in identifying drug toxicity precipitating hospitalization, among elderly users of high-risk medications. Study Design and Setting: We conducted a cross-sectional evaluation assessing the diagnostic test characteristics of International Classification of Diseases-9 External-Cause-of-Injury codes (E-codes) compared with a reference standard of medical record review. This study was nested within a prospective cohort of elders using warfarin, digoxin, or phenytoin as identified in the Pharmaceutical Assistance Contract for the Elderly benefit program. Results: We identified 4,803 subjects contributing 11,409 person-years of exposure to at least one of three drug groups. Subjects experienced 8,756 hospitalizations, of which 304 were deemed, by expert review, to be a result of an adverse event of warfarin, digoxin, or phenytoin. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPVs) and negative predictive values for drug-specific E-codes were warfarin-25.5%, 98.3%, 46.6%, and 95.7%; digoxin-84.0%, 99.1%, 56.8%, and 99.8%; and phenytoin-86.7%, 98.7%, 59.1%, and 99.7%. Conclusions: E-codes for digoxin and phenytoin have a high sensitivity, but E-codes for all three medications have poor PPVs, a result that might produce misclassification in studies based solely on discharge coding. Investigators should confirm such rare events via medical record review. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available