4.6 Article

Probit structural equation regression model: general depressive symptoms predicted post-myocardial infarction mortality after controlling for somatic symptoms of depression

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 61, Issue 8, Pages 832-839

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.09.008

Keywords

myocardial infarction; mortality; depression; assessment; Beck Depression Inventory; confirmatory factor analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Reported links between depression and post-acute myocardial infarction (AMI) mortality may be due to confounding between somatic symptoms of depression and symptoms related to the AMI. The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between depressive symptoms and 12-month post-AMI mortality after removing potential bias from somatic symptoms of depression. Study Design and Setting: Four hundred seventy-seven hospitalized AMI patients from 12 cardiac care units. The relationship of a General Depression factor with mortality was assessed using a probit structural equation regression model, controlling for an uncorrelated somatic symptom factor, age, Killip class, previous AMI, and other potential confounders. Results: Mortality was significantly predicted by the General Depression factor (P = 0.009), controlling for age (P = 0.128), Killip class (P = 0.210), history of AMI (P = 0.001), and other predictors in a structural equation model that removed variance related to somatic factors, but unrelated to the General Depression factor. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the use of structural equation modeling presents a viable mechanism to test links between symptoms of depression and health outcomes among patients with AMI after explicitly removing variance due to somatic symptoms that is unrelated to the General Depression factor. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available