4.7 Article

Inhaled Growth Hormone (GH) Compared with Subcutaneous GH in Children with GH Deficiency: Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Volume 94, Issue 6, Pages 2052-2059

Publisher

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2008-1897

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Eli Lilly and Co

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Delivery of GH via inhalation is a potential alternative to injection. Previous studies of inhaled GH in adults have demonstrated safety and tolerability. Objective: We sought to assess safety and tolerability of inhaled GH in children and to estimate relative bioavailability and biopotency between inhaled GH and sc GH. Design/Methods: This pediatric multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial had two 7-d treatment phases. Patients received inhaled GH and sc GH in the alternate phase. Placebo was administered by the route opposite from active drug. GH and IGF-I levels were measured at multiple time points. Pharmacokinetics were assessed using noncompartmental methods. Results: Twenty-two GH-deficient children aged 6-16 yr were treated. Absorption of GH appeared to be faster after inhalation with maximum serum concentrations measured at 1-4 h compared with 2-8 h for sc GH. Mean relative bioavailability for inhaled GH was 3.5% (90% confidence interval 2.7-4.4%). Mean relative biopotency, based on IGF-I response, was 5.5% (confidence interval 5.2-5.8%). Similar dose-dependent increases in mean serum GH area under the curve and IGF-I changes from baseline were seen after inhaled and sc GH doses. Inhaled GH was well tolerated and preferred to injection. No significant changes in pulmonary function tests were seen. Conclusions: In this first pediatric trial of GH delivered by inhalation, it was well tolerated and resulted in dose-dependent increases in serum GH and IGF-I levels. This study establishes that delivery of GH via the deep lung is feasible in children. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94: 2052-2059, 2009)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available