4.7 Article

Indian Ocean Variability in the CMIP5 Multimodel Ensemble: The Basin Mode

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
Volume 26, Issue 18, Pages 7240-7266

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00678.1

Keywords

Indian Ocean; Atmosphere-ocean interaction; ENSO; Climate models; Model evaluation; performance; Climate variability

Funding

  1. MoST [2012CB955603, 2010CB950302]
  2. CAS [XDA05090404]
  3. NSFC [41176024, 41106010]
  4. LTO [LTOZZ1202]
  5. NSF
  6. JAMSTEC
  7. Directorate For Geosciences
  8. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [1305719] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the simulation of the Indian Ocean Basin (IOB) mode and relevant physical processes in models from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). Historical runs from 20 CMIP5 models are available for the analysis. They reproduce the IOB mode and its close relationship to El Nino-Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Half of the models capture key IOB processes: a downwelling oceanic Rossby wave in the southern tropical Indian Ocean (TIO) precedes the IOB development in boreal fall and triggers an antisymmetric wind anomaly pattern across the equator in the following spring. The anomalous wind pattern induces a second warming in the north Indian Ocean (NIO) through summer and sustains anticyclonic wind anomalies in the northwest Pacific by radiating a warm tropospheric Kelvin wave. The second warming in the NIO is indicative of ocean-atmosphere interaction in the interior TIO. More than half of the models display a double peak in NIO warming, as observed following El Nino, while the rest show only one winter peak. The intermodel diversity in the characteristics of the IOB mode seems related to the thermocline adjustment in the south TIO to ENSO-induced wind variations. Almost all the models show multidecadal variations in IOB variance, possibly modulated by ENSO.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available